Limits


 Math > Math Concepts  >  Calculus  > Limits
 
  Topic Index
 Math
  - math subjects
  - by grade level
 Math Help
  - Math Help Forum
  - Math Tutoring
  - Math Blog for K-12
 Math Games
  - Games Index
 Math Worksheets
  - math worksheets
 Math Books
  - Used Textbooks
  - BudgeText
  - Follett Ed. Services
 Resources
  - The Math Forum
 

Limits


Intuitive Approach

Suppose the function f(x) = x + 7. And let's say x = 1. Now let's increase x from 1 to 5 in steps of 1.

x = 1

f(1) = 8

x = 2

f(2) = 9

x = 3

f(3) = 10

x = 4

f(4) = 11

x = 5

f(5) = 12

For values of x just less than 5, that is as x is close to 5, f(x) is close to 12.

Also, for values of x that are approximately equal to 5, f(x) is approximately equal to 12.

As x approaches 5 then f(x) approaches 12.  12 is the limit as x approaches 5.


The word approaches is represented bythe symbol .  So the previous statement would be written
as x → 5, f(x) → 12.



Suppose we change this function to





In this case the function is identical except at x = 5. Here it “jumps” to 20. Yet we still say the limit of this new function as x approaches 5 is still 12. In fact if there was no value for f(x) at x = 5, the limit still exists and is 12.


All we care about is how case f(x) behaves near x=5.


The notation used to express a limit is:






We read this like so: the limit of f-of-x as x approaches c is l.

The notation “xc” means that x approaches c from either side of c.   In other words, the limit exists and is equal to l in both cases; as x increases toward c and as x decreases toward c.


The following graph illustrates the meaning of a limit.



This graph shows a function f(x) in red.  If we start at point p1 and move x toward x = c, p1 moves along the curve towards p2.  f(x) moves toward y = l, which is the value of f(x) at x = c.  This behavior is shown by the blue arrows.


Likewise if we move x starting at point p3 toward x = c, p3 moves along the curve toward p2.  f(x) moves toward y = l, which again, is the value of f(x) at x = c.  This behavior is shown by green arrows.



The following graph illustrates a jump at x = c.  




Notice at x = c, if(c) is not on the curve, but above it creating a hole on the curve at p2.

The curve approaches l as x decreases and as x increases toward c.   With limits we do not concern ourselves with what happens at x = c, but we concern ourselves with the values the function approaches as x becomes nearer and nearer to c.  If these values are equal then the limit exists at x = c.


Here is an example of a function where the limit does not exist at x = c.





This function is f(x) = 5 for x < c, f(x) = -5 for x > c, at x=c f(x) does not exist. A hole is shown by the circles at the endpoints of the branches at x = c.


As x approaches c from x < c, f(x) remains 5. As x approaches c from x > c, f(x) remains -5.  p1 and p2 represent these limits on each side of x=c and their y coordinates are different.
In this case the limit of f(x) as x approaches c does not exist.


The limits from each side of x=c are called one-sided limits. One-sided limits at x = c must exist and be equal for the limit to exist.

A special notation is used for one-sided limits that uses up and down arrows.


The limit of f(x) as x increases toward c is l.


The limit of f(x) as x decreases toward c is l.



For the previous example we would write:


and but does not exist.


Here is another example where the limit does not exist at x = c.

This example is the function f(x) = 1/x, and c = 0.




Recall that f(x) is a hyperbola with the Y and X axes as asymptotes.

In blue we see that as x approaches zero f(x) becomes more and more negative with no limit, that is, it decreases with no bound.


Using limit notation we express this as:


asymptote1 (1K)

And in green as x approaches zero f(x) becomes more and more positive with no limit, that is, increases with no bound.


Using limits this is expressed as:


asymptote2 (1K)

Since here is no limit either way we approach 0 therefore the limit at x = 0 does not exist.



Now as x increases with no limit, f(x) decreases toward 0.  The X axis is the asymptote and the Y coordinate of the X axis is the limit, 0, for f(x).


Mathematically we express this like so:

asymptote3 (1K)

Likewise as x decreases (becomes more negative) with no limit, f(x) again approaches 0.  The negative X axis is the asymptote whose Y coordinate is the limit of f(x).

Mathematically:


asymptote4 (1K)

As x approaches zero there is no limit for f(x).

The Y axis is the asymptote for f(x).

f(x) never crosses the X axis but gets closer and closer to it, approaching 0.


The word infinity, represented by the symbol ∞, is not a number.  It is conceptually incorrect to think of it as a number.

This equation: asymptote1 (1K) is read like so:
as x increases toward zero, f(x) decreases negatively with no limit.


Having said this, it is common to hear this equation read this way: the limit of f(x) as x approaches zero is negative infinity.


Infinity is a concept, it is used to describe a nonempty set that has no cardinality.


The meaning we seek is "there is no number to express this limit," that is, there is no limit, or the limit simply does not exist.  We stretch the meaning in equations involving limits.  The limit equation expresses an equality and because of the equal sign, we usually think of the strict equality of two numbers.  With limits we don't think of equality but we think of nearness.  We then place the concept, ∞, in a position usually occupied by a number.  We're overloading the concept of strict equality in this case with a shorthand notation to express "with no bound."  And this leads to the conceptual error that ∞ is a number.   Make your best attempts to read these equations involving ∞ correctly, doing so will pay off in higher level Mathematics courses.

Example


Using this graph for f(x):






as x increases toward 4, f(x) increases toward the limit 7


as x decreases toward 4, f(x) increases toward the limit 4


there is no limit, since the previous one sided limits differ


as x increases toward 9, f(x) increases toward the limit 6


as x decreases toward 9, f(x) increases toward the limit 7


there is no limit, since the previous one sided limits differ


f(x) is not defined in this interval ( , -7), there is no limit



f(x) becomes more negative as x approaches -7, the asymptote,

there is no limit.


there is no limit since the previous one sided limits do not exist






Here are some results regarding limits.


If f(x) and g(x) are functions where:




The limit of a constant is that constant.”


The limit of a constant multiplied by a function is that constant multiplied by the limit of the function.”


The limit of the sum is the sum of the limits.”


The limit of the product is the product of the limits.”/P>


The limit of the quotient is the quotient of the limits.”


Later we'll call f(x) and g(x) "continuous" functions.



Examples:


lim ( x + 6) = lim x + lim 6



lim( 2 – x) = lim 2 - lim x = 2 – lim x


lim 3x = lim 3 lim x = 3 lim x



lim x/5 = (lim x) / (lim 5) = (lim x) / 5




Algebraic examples:

Find the limits.


1)

As x approaches 5, (x) approaches 5. The limit is 5.

2)


as x approaches 5, x2 approaches 25, this limit is

the sum of these individual limits: 25 + 5 = 30.

3)

This limit does not exist. As x approaches 0, 1/x becomes larger and larger with no bound.

4)


As x approaches c, x – c approaches 0, and as in the previous example 1/(x-c) becomes larger and larger with no bound. Therefore the limit does not exist.

5)

At x = 3 this ratio is indeterminate. But we are not concerned with x = 3, but with x very close to 3. So, as long as x 3 then we can divide (x – 3) into x2 – x - 6 and get (x + 2).

(by factoring the numerator to (x-3)(x+2) and canceling (x-3)).


Now as x approaches 3, this ratio approaches

(3 + 2) = 5.

6)


As x 4, (x + 4) 0, but we are not concerned at x = ―4.

For x ≠ ―4, we can simplify this ratio to 1, and we have

The limit is therefore 1.

7)

At x = 5 this ratio is 0/0 is indeterminate. But for all x near 5 we can simplify this ratio to 1/(x-5). And we saw in example 4, that this limit does not exist.


(note: (x-5)(x-5) = x2 -10x + 25)



8)

The limit argument is a constant therefore any change in x has no change in 15. The limit is therefore 15.

9)

Be careful here. This example refers to the limit of 6y
NOT the limit of (6y + 12).  Notice that the grouping symbols are missing in this example.  12 is NOT part of the limit expression.  We add 12 to the limit we of 6y.  f(x) = 6y. f(x) means a function whose independent variable is 'x'.  Unless otherwise stated, 6y is not affected by the change in x.  6y is constant so its limit is 6y.  But we must include 12 so this whole expression becomes 6y + 12.  The limit is 6y + 12.


Yes, we normally think of y = f(x). But do not assume it is unless this relationship is made explicit. In this case it is not defined as such.


9a)

#9, and let
y = 2x + 1

Here we need to substitute (2x + 1) for y in the limit argument to get 6(2x + 1) = (12x + 6).
Now as x → 15 then (12x +6) → (12 ⋅ 15 + 6) = 186

So this limit is 186 + 12 = 198.

10)




At x = 3, f(x) equals -15 and 15, so f(x) is NOT defined at x = 3; this function “jumps from -15 to +15 at x = 3. This is ok because we're concerned only with x close to 3.


In this case the left sided limit (x < 3, approaching 3 from the left) is (-5)(3) = -15. The right sided limit is (5)(3)=15. For a the limit to exist it must be the same from both sides. Here it is not, -15 15, so the limit does not exist.

11)





For x < 0, f(x) is negative; for x > 0 f(x) is positive. At x = 0, f(x) is not defined. (The function definition does not define f(0), we have to assume f(x) is not defined at x = 0.)


and



Since these one sided limits are equal it follows that the limit of f(x) as x 0 is 0.


12)



As we saw in example 3, does not exist. We

also saw in example 1 that exists and equals 0. The limits must exist for each term in the limit expression for the limit of that expressionto exist.  
In this case the limit only exists for the first term, x, but not for the second term 1/x.  Therefore, the limit does not exist for the sum of these terms.


13)



This example is the same as example 12 except the limit has x approaching 1.


Example 1 tells us that the limit of the first term is 1 and the limit of the second term is also 1. Therefore the limit exists and equals 1 + 1 = 2.




We've discussed examples where the limit of a function can increase or decrease without bound.   We've also seen that there can be jumps/breaks in the function where the on-sided limits differ at the break.   In both cases we said that the limit does not exist.   Even though the two cases are different, and we should distiguish them, we usually don't, caring only whether or not the limit exists, and if so, what that limit is.  These cases will become important, however, when we later discuss derivatives.



This is another FREE TEMPLATE PRINTABLE presented to you from the Template section of K12math.com

 
 

Download our free math lesson plan template...and print!!

about us | site index | topic index

K12math.com copyright 2010